Teams

MO - Denson

2024 Combo 18 & Over Men - Mobile · 5.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 5.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Peter Samaj
published
3.05
James LaRose
published
2.97
Mark LaRose
published
2.81
Aaron Sutherland
published 3
2.73
Farzam Bayat
published
2.71
Matt Singleton
published
2.70
Aaron Long
published 3
2.67
Edward G McDermott
published
2.66
Jeffrey Denson
published
2.34
Robert Kohrman
published
Roger Summerour
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James LaRose + Mark LaRose11172% games+11.4% vs expected
Aaron Long + Jeffrey Denson1738% games−3.6% vs expected
Edward G McDermott + Aaron Long2631% games−13.9% vs expected
Farzam Bayat + Jeffrey Denson1423% gamesnot enough data
Farzam Bayat + Mark LaRose044 matchesnot enough data
Edward G McDermott + Matt Singleton224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Samaj
29W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.08
James LaRose
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.05
Mark LaRose
38W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Aaron Sutherland
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Farzam Bayat
13W–40L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Matt Singleton
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Aaron Long
17W–40L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Edward G McDermott
13W–29L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Jeffrey Denson
8W–40L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
Robert Kohrman
4W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%87%13%
2.34
Roger Summerour
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.