Teams

Sun City Center - K. Johnson

2025 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over Men · 6.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-16vs Hunters Green Slimers - M. WarrenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKEVIN JOHNSON / Wayne Keyes vs Christopher Baker / Gregg Sturdevant3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Gray / Bob Astone vs John Cotey / Robert Philbin6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-09vs Buckhorn Brawlers - J. TorresWon 30
W#1 DoublesBob Astone / Brian Gray vs Ryan Hughes / Felipe Burrego6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStuart Fisher / Michael Nugent vs Omar Cantu / Daniel Espinoza7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKEVIN JOHNSON / Wayne Keyes vs Maurice Steenland / Jason Padua6-1, 6-0
2025-07-26vs Hunters Green Slimers - M. WarrenWon 21
W#1 DoublesKEVIN JOHNSON / Wayne Keyes vs Sean Friday / Randall Smith6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBrian Gray / Glenn Brown vs Ken Kranick / Manoj Krishna Kumar Unni2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Nugent / Stuart Fisher vs Philip Kalafut / Mark Weissman6-2, 6-1
2025-06-28vs Hunters Green Slimers - M. WarrenLost 03
L#1 DoublesKEVIN JOHNSON / Bob Astone vs Christopher Baker / Randall Smith4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Nugent / Wayne Keyes vs Ken Kranick / Manoj Krishna Kumar Unni6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFred Sternberg / Stuart Fisher vs Matthew Warren / Steven Sutton2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
KEVIN JOHNSON
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Brian Gray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Fred Sternberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Randy McPhee
published
3.18
Wayne Keyes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Michael Nugent
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Bob Astone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Stuart Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Gray + Bob Astone3348% gamesnot enough data
KEVIN JOHNSON + Michael Nugent1437% gamesnot enough data
KEVIN JOHNSON + Wayne Keyes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KEVIN JOHNSON
11W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Brian Gray
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Fred Sternberg
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Randy McPhee
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Wayne Keyes
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Michael Nugent
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Bob Astone
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Stuart Fisher
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.