Teams

Ju.Jones40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-23vs Li.Nguyen40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesTyler Salisbury / Jason Sage vs Joe Smith / Andre Rodriguez6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTerence McKee / Sean Ahr vs Takayuki Yamato / John VanDeWater3-6, 3-6
2025-04-09vs Jo.Bruckel40ASplit 11
W#2 DoublesJason Sage / Mark Camacho vs Robert Whitehurst / John Bruckel6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJoe Murphy / Tyler Salisbury vs Daniel Breazeale / Alan Crews5-7, 4-6
2025-03-27vs Am.Narula40ALost 02
L#2 DoublesJason Sage / Joe Murphy vs Scott McElreath / Brady Allen6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFrank Moser / Sean Ahr vs Amrit Narula / Santha Perian2-6, 1-6
2025-03-19vs Sp.Huffstetler40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesTyler Salisbury / Jason Sage vs Aaron Earwood / Spence Huffstetler3-6, 5-7
2025-03-12vs Te.Sherburne40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Smith / Tyler Salisbury vs Ted Sherburne / Scott Cunningham4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSean Ahr / Peter Westgate vs Jonathan Adams / Penn Holderness3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kevin Wolborsky
published
3.73
Nick Martinelli
published
3.72
Mark Camacho
published
3.70
Joe Murphy
published
3.65
David Mailly
published 4
3.61
Frank Moser
published
3.59
Tyler Salisbury
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.57
Peter Westgate
published
3.54
Jason Sage
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.37
Terence McKee
published
3.24
Sean Ahr
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Pete Padilla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Salisbury + Jason Sage91547% games−13.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Wolborsky
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Nick Martinelli
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Mark Camacho
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Joe Murphy
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
David Mailly
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Frank Moser
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Tyler Salisbury
48W–86L career · 11 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Peter Westgate
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Jason Sage
85W–134L career · 7 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Terence McKee
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
Sean Ahr
37W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Pete Padilla
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.