Teams

DavidPark/Feder

2025 Broward Combo 18 & Over - Day · 8.5 Day

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-29vs Broward/MollLost 02
L#2 DoublesRachel Seifer / Lori Schlam vs Natalia Moll / Marta Pena3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMarci Feder / Sahar Moghaddam vs Romina Paludi / Camille Naranjo2-6, 0-6
2025-08-18vs DavidPark/LorenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMaria Hernandez / Sahar Moghaddam vs Ellen Raskin / Maria Brozzi6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Cristina Tomadin vs Gricel Boto Bernales / Maria Valeria O'Reilly7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-08vs Broward/MollLost 01
L#1 DoublesSamie Lesperance / Rachel Seifer vs Natalia Moll / Marta Pena2-6, 0-6
2025-07-25vs DavidPark/LorenWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Hernandez / Sahar Moghaddam vs Ellen Raskin / Susie Valls2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-18vs Broward/MollWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Hernandez / Sahar Moghaddam vs Romina Paludi / Courtney Carpenter6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Samie Lesperance
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Laurie Mathews
published
4.03
Marci Feder
published
4.02
Michele King
published
3.96
Lori Schlam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Sahar Moghaddam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Cristina Tomadin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Rachel Seifer
published
3.75
Wendy Sosa
published
3.71
Laura Mendelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Mathews + Marci Feder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Samie Lesperance
247W–110L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Laurie Mathews
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Marci Feder
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Michele King
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
4.02
Lori Schlam
45W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Sahar Moghaddam
279W–189L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Cristina Tomadin
266W–200L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Rachel Seifer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Wendy Sosa
16W–22L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Laura Mendelson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.