Teams

Wild Timber (Lindsay Hofmann)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.5 Women (Arrie Lugar)

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-01-07vs St.Ives (Stephanie Butler)*Won 50
W#1 DoublesAshley Hooie / Lindsay Hofmann vs Susan Matt / Terri Noble1-6, 6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSusan Hawkins vs Dianne Willis7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKat Ponzio / Susan Kim vs Teri Hernandez / Wendy Nunlee4-6, 6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStacy de Rogatis / Kinley Thomas vs Ashley Guelfo / Cindy Wollstein6-0, 0-6, 7-6
W#4 DoublesValentina Ichim / Kimberly Jarry vs Daria Ficco / Misti Howie6-4, 6-3
2024-12-23vs USTA Atlanta/Jodi GustafsonWon 32
W#1 DoublesLindsay Hofmann / Eileen Cobb vs Candace Smith / Katie Mays6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSandy McQueen vs Tina Ballon6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaridell Banks / Susan Cangelosi vs Valerie McMichael / Erin Rhatigan1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Bak / Susan Kim vs Melissa Cusimano / Lori Kallensee3-6, 6-4, 6-3
L#4 DoublesKinley Thomas / Valentina Ichim vs Jodi Gustafson / Sophie MacLean1-6, 6-1, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Sandy McQueen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.53
Ashley Hooie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Valentina Ichim
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kat Ponzio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Eileen Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Lindsay Hofmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Candi Harris
published 3.5
3.35
Melissa Rain
published
3.30
Maridell Banks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Jamie Bak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Susan Hawkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Kinley Thomas
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Kimberly Jarry
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Stacy de Rogatis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Susan Cangelosi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Diana Hilger
published 3.5
2.81
Pamela Boutin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valentina Ichim + Kinley Thomas3255% games+14.5% vs expected
Jamie Bak + Kinley Thomas7257% games+8.8% vs expected
Maridell Banks + Eileen Cobb7070% games+8.6% vs expected
Jamie Bak + Melissa Rain5062% games+7.9% vs expected
Melissa Rain + Kimberly Jarry11364% games+7.3% vs expected
Ashley Hooie + Sandy McQueen3357% games+6.1% vs expected
Lindsay Hofmann + Candi Harris14558% games+0.4% vs expected
Ashley Hooie + Candi Harris14660% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy McQueen
71W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.72
3.5
Ashley Hooie
119W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Valentina Ichim
53W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Kat Ponzio
27W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Eileen Cobb
63W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Lindsay Hofmann
105W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Candi Harris
62W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Melissa Rain
30W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Maridell Banks
90W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Jamie Bak
82W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Susan Hawkins
36W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Kinley Thomas
31W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Kimberly Jarry
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Stacy de Rogatis
73W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Susan Cangelosi
34W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Diana Hilger
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Pamela Boutin
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.