Teams

5-MLong-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-20vs 3-CSundy-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Adams / Laura Webb-Murrah vs Cynthia Sundy / Atsuko Duncan4-6, 6-7
2024-09-13vs 1-KWalton-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Adams / Laura Webb-Murrah vs Tammy Bradley / Brenda Pratt2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-06vs 4-NDraughon-YMCALost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Webb-Murrah / Diane Adams vs Nancy Draughon / Laura Riedel1-6, 3-6
2024-09-03vs 6-VArne-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Alden / Laura Webb-Murrah vs Beth Spinarski / Jeanne Beckley7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-23vs 3-CSundy-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Webb-Murrah / Stacy Brehm vs Joanne McCallie / Cynthia Sundy5-7, 1-6
2024-08-21vs 2-SFunkhouser-HRLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Webb-Murrah / Stacy Brehm vs Kay Mabe / Leona Buckley4-6, 2-6
2024-08-16vs 1-KWalton-CHTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Adams / Laura Webb-Murrah vs Amy Tiemann / Mel Huey6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Lisa Montague
published
3.38
Donna Spero
published 3.5
3.37
Caroline Patzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Susan Alden
published
3.20
Laura Webb-Murrah
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.14
Jane Thrailkill
published
2.87
Susan Graff
published
2.82
Stacy Brehm
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Patzer + Stacy Brehm61842% games+1.3% vs expected
Stacy Brehm + Mary T Long134 matchesnot enough data
Laura Webb-Murrah + Donna Spero314 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Patzer + Mary T Long303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Montague
39W–48L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.67
3.5
Donna Spero
33W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Caroline Patzer
142W–90L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Susan Alden
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Laura Webb-Murrah
110W–119L career · 13 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Jane Thrailkill
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Susan Graff
43W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Stacy Brehm
92W–161L career · 10 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.