Teams

Fred Wells Sollenberger 12:30

2022 Women's Daytime Doubles · 4.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clay Sollenberger
published 4.5
Deborah Stein
published 4.5
4.19
Rachel LaTour
published
4.12
Taylor Reiners
published
4.11
Missy Swiller
published
4.06
Lesley Longval
published
4.03
Cecilia Grass-Neary
published 4.5
3.99
Sally Leary
published
3.98
Noelle Dougan
published
3.98
Leslie Connelly
published
3.89
Jean Noack
published
3.82
Janice Ring
published
3.79
Laura Dale
published
3.76
Kara Fairbairn
published
3.75
Erika Skanse
published 4
Jessie Tschida
published
Molly Peterson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noelle Dougan + Jean Noack044 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Connelly + Sally Leary213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clay Sollenberger
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Deborah Stein
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel LaTour
30W–19L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Taylor Reiners
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
4.12
Missy Swiller
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11
Lesley Longval
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Cecilia Grass-Neary
12W–26L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
Sally Leary
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.99
Noelle Dougan
25W–45L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Leslie Connelly
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Jean Noack
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.89
Janice Ring
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Laura Dale
18W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Kara Fairbairn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Erika Skanse
27W–21L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Jessie Tschida
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Peterson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.