Teams

CV-Shadow Mountain Resort/Denton & Lestrange

2022 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesMaureen Crover / Barbara Wood vs Alice Keung / Alethea Platis6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaureen Crover / Megan Bigbee vs Patricia Baughman / Staci Munic4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Gill / Megan Bigbee vs Laura Susskind / Mary Lockrem6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCOLLEEN Jarrar / Janice Malos vs Linda Moskowitz / Marta Mykytyn-Hill7-5, 6-4
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wood / Suzette Willetts vs Marcia Howell / Lesley Gagnon7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Bigbee / Maureen Crover vs Gina Orban / Kathryn Tomasino6-2, 6-3
2022-11-13vs CV-Indian Wells TG/Simmons & BarnesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBarbara Wood / COLLEEN Jarrar vs Alethea Platis / Janice Savidge6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Bigbee / Lori Gill vs Karin Barnes / Ailee Robertson0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMaureen Crover / Barbara Wood vs Staci Munic / Celeste Manolas6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStephania Denton / Megan Bigbee vs Mary Fox / Wanda Ramos2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Malos / Sonia Gleadle vs Patricia Baughman / Karen Meyer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJanice Malos / Sonia Gleadle vs Shelley Lynch / Michele Weddle1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSuzette Willetts / Barbara Wood vs Nadine Kim / Marcia Howell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Bigbee / Stephania Denton vs Sanae Chance / Barbara Holmsten2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Suzette Willetts
published
3.30
COLLEEN Jarrar
published 3.5
Barbara Wood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Megan Bigbee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Stephania Denton
published
2.79
Amanda Bice
published 3.5
Janice Malos
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Carol Mallabone
published
Lori Gill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Gill + Megan Bigbee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzette Willetts
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
COLLEEN Jarrar
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Barbara Wood
53W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Megan Bigbee
31W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephania Denton
16W–23L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Amanda Bice
28W–39L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
2.79
3
Janice Malos
29W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Carol Mallabone
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Gill
15W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.