Teams

MORAGA CC 40AW3.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Christina Fong
published 4
3.48
Bryn Strong
published 3.5
3.38
Tracey Guerin
published
3.35
Sarah Franz
published
3.32
Jennifer Bahm
published
3.32
Blaire Morse
published 3.5
3.32
Sarah Yancey
published
3.25
Andrea Hogan
published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Bond
published
3.16
Kim Morrow
published
3.15
Kim Krozek
published
3.15
Jacqueline Tanner
published
3.13
Megan Buckley
published
3.09
Gena Schwartz
published
3.04
Melissa Isola
published
3.00
Karin Hein
published
2.95
Jennifer Laforce
published
2.88
Susan Levy
published
2.83
Karen Chiarucci
published
2.57
Lisa Lavelle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Guerin + Jennifer Bahm2551% games+2.6% vs expected
Tracey Guerin + Blaire Morse213 matchesnot enough data
Karin Hein + Jennifer Laforce303 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Hogan + Jennifer Bahm213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Fong
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Bryn Strong
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
3.48
Tracey Guerin
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Sarah Franz
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Jennifer Bahm
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Blaire Morse
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Sarah Yancey
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Andrea Hogan
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Jennifer Bond
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Kim Morrow
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Kim Krozek
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
Jacqueline Tanner
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Megan Buckley
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Gena Schwartz
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
Melissa Isola
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04
Karin Hein
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jennifer Laforce
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Susan Levy
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Karen Chiarucci
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.83
Lisa Lavelle
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.