Teams

LTFCS DARK

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-30Lost 01
L#2 SinglesHamid Mortazavi vs Matthew Pape2-6, 2-6
2023-05-23vs CSRC GAYDOSWon 10
W#2 DoublesHamid Mortazavi / Randall Bourgeois vs Charlie Cuthill / Mark Phelan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-02vs GOG ENGELAGEWon 10
W#1 SinglesHamid Mortazavi vs Mark McDowell6-3, 6-3
2023-04-25vs FHCS THORNALLYLost 01
L#1 SinglesHamid Mortazavi vs Mike Daniels1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Trent Glaser
published
3.46
Hamid Mortazavi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Taylor Lierheimer
published
3.29
John Purcell
published
3.27
Randall Bourgeois
published
3.20
Cederick Dark
published 3.5
3.17
Brett Matheson
published 3.5
3.13
James Gaston
published
2.90
Neal Siegel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cederick Dark + Taylor Lierheimer4251% games+4.6% vs expected
Brett Matheson + James Gaston4250% games−0.8% vs expected
James Gaston + Neal Siegel1640% games−6.8% vs expected
Trent Glaser + Cederick Dark2350% gamesnot enough data
Trent Glaser + Taylor Lierheimer224 matchesnot enough data
John Purcell + Randall Bourgeois213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trent Glaser
24W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Hamid Mortazavi
69W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Taylor Lierheimer
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
John Purcell
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Randall Bourgeois
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cederick Dark
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Brett Matheson
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
James Gaston
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Neal Siegel
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.