Teams

MoValley/Dotson/65&over6.0 M

2022 TUL ADULT 65 & Over League · 6.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-24vs Rafters/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesKenneth Beck / Tom Cooper vs James Sturdivant / Paul Hutter6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKen Hird / Robert Jones vs Mark Barrett / Fred Perry6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRichard White / Larry Dotson vs Nick Nail / MARCUS DUNLAP2-4
2022-09-23vs Rafters/LFWon 20
W#1 DoublesKen Hird / Larry Dotson vs Nick Nail / James Sturdivant6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJames Rader / Tom Cooper vs Fred Perry / Paul Hutter7-5, 7-5
2022-09-21vs Rafters/LFWon 20
W#1 DoublesCurt Carmichael / Larry Dotson vs Nick Nail / MARCUS DUNLAP5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Rader / Richard White vs Fred Perry / Paul Hutter7-6, 6-3
2022-09-17vs Rafters/LFWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Jones / Ken Hird vs James Sturdivant / Paul Hutter6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLarry Dotson / James Rader vs MARCUS DUNLAP / Nick Nail6-1, 6-2
2022-09-16vs Rafters/LFWon 20
W#1 DoublesLarry Dotson / James Rader vs MARCUS DUNLAP / Nick Nail6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKen Hird / Robert Jones vs James Sturdivant / Paul Hutter6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Kenneth Beck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Curt Carmichael
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
James Rader
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Larry Dotson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ken Hird
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Tom Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Tompie Whitworth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Hird + Larry Dotson6750% games+4.4% vs expected
Larry Dotson + Curt Carmichael2447% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Beck + Curt Carmichael2447% gamesnot enough data
Tom Cooper + Kenneth Beck4164% gamesnot enough data
Larry Dotson + James Rader3251% gamesnot enough data
Tom Cooper + Larry Dotson224 matchesnot enough data
Ken Hird + Curt Carmichael314 matchesnot enough data
Larry Dotson + Kenneth Beck314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Beck
104W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Curt Carmichael
121W–140L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
James Rader
41W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Larry Dotson
54W–70L career · 9 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Ken Hird
66W–72L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Cooper
47W–49L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tompie Whitworth
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.