Teams

Sunset Hills We Can't Drive 55

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-02vs Pierpont 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesFuat Doymaz / Michael Garland vs Jim Brown / John Cotsis6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErnie Sandlin / Fred Cohen vs James Worden / Matthew Maxel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTrevor Clark / Matt Bridges vs Tony Ferguson / Steven Yamamoto6-3, 6-4
2025-08-01vs The WACky 55'sWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Garland / Earl Schwartz vs Ardy Afshar / Eric Weilage6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMatt Bridges / Chuck Mathews vs Tim Bearer / Steven Bleier2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTrevor Clark / Fuat Doymaz vs Curtis Cutting / Todd Isroelit6-3, 7-5
2025-07-13vs Pierpont 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Mantai / Earl Schwartz vs David Raulin / Lester Tong4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Dunlop / Michael Garland vs Jim Brown / Matthew Maxel1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTrevor Clark / Fuat Doymaz vs Tony Ferguson / Dennis Urasaki1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Earl Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Michael Mantai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
John Dunlop
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Michael Garland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Fred Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Chuck Mathews
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Fuat Doymaz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ernie Sandlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Trevor Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Herschel Berger
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Earl Schwartz + Michael Mantai9361% games+20.5% vs expected
Fred Cohen + Michael Mantai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Earl Schwartz
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Michael Mantai
36W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
John Dunlop
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Michael Garland
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Fred Cohen
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Chuck Mathews
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Fuat Doymaz
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Ernie Sandlin
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Trevor Clark
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Herschel Berger
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.