Teams

EW-WCCP-Tombari

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-04-30vs EW-YTC-FlycktWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarie Lambert / Nancy Bettesworth vs Arti Smith / Martha Marchand6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJeneen Barratt / Stephanie Butler vs Kathleen McIver / Lory Allen1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Farley / Shirlee Steiner vs Susan Bickley / Kimberlee Foster6-1, 6-3
2023-04-29vs EW-YTC-FlycktWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Bettesworth / Marie Lambert vs Kathleen McIver / Joyce Flyckt7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVoni Tombari / Jeneen Barratt vs Susan Bickley / Kathy Dinwiddie6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPamela Farley / Cheryl Stransky vs Martha Marchand / Arti Smith6-3, 6-4
2023-04-29vs EW-YTC-FlycktWon 30
W#1 DoublesVoni Tombari / Stephanie Butler vs Kathleen McIver / Joyce Flyckt6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMuriel Blevins / Shirlee Steiner vs Arti Smith / Martha Marchand3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Stransky / Marian Menke vs Kimberlee Foster / Lory Allen6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Voni Tombari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Shirlee Steiner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Marie Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Nancy Bettesworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Cheryl Stransky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Pamela Farley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Jeneen Barratt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marian Menke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Muriel Blevins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Bettesworth + Cheryl Stransky8559% games+0.4% vs expected
Marian Menke + Shirlee Steiner7356% games−0.5% vs expected
Marian Menke + Cheryl Stransky6748% games−2.7% vs expected
Shirlee Steiner + Voni Tombari8753% games−3.5% vs expected
Marie Lambert + Nancy Bettesworth383350% games−5.1% vs expected
Pamela Farley + Marian Menke3736% games−9.6% vs expected
Pamela Farley + Cheryl Stransky3543% games−13.3% vs expected
Jeneen Barratt + Voni Tombari6264% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Voni Tombari
75W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Shirlee Steiner
59W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Marie Lambert
73W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Nancy Bettesworth
52W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Cheryl Stransky
52W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.62
3
Pamela Farley
27W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.45
Jeneen Barratt
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.44
Marian Menke
19W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Muriel Blevins
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.