Teams

TOC.Felts

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-04vs TOC.XuSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew Pham / Davis Felts vs Justin Fowler / Patrick Grant1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJaxon Davis / Jack Baur vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-03vs TING.ByrdLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavis Humphries / Jack Baur vs Patrick Shields / Kwame Owens4-6, 3-6
2024-09-23vs TING.MackWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Andrew Pham vs Nick Gilder / Joe Navejas6-3, 6-4
2024-09-06vs MCP.HanauerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJack Baur / Jaxon Davis vs Beomjun Ju / Bongsang Cho6-2, 7-6
2024-08-25vs MD.JenningsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavis Felts / Rawle Sue-Ho vs Jim Riddick / Chris Crumpler7-5, 6-2
2024-08-11vs MCP.HanauerWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Dinicola / Maxwell Gregson vs Dipen Vyas / Brady Sowers6-1, 6-2
2024-08-04vs TING.ByrdLost 01
L#3 DoublesTyler Carroll / Davis Felts vs Brett Eckles / Nicholas Lau6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Parv Mital
published
4.40
Andrew Dinicola
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Rawle Sue-Ho
published
4.33
Tyler Carroll
published
4.25
Gaurav Luther
published
4.20
Jack Baur
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Davis Felts
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Davis Humphries
published 4.5
4.05
Brennan Doran
published 4.5
3.93
Peter Blankenship
published
3.93
Maxwell Gregson
published
3.75
Thomas Hodges
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Carroll + Rawle Sue-Ho8066% games+8.9% vs expected
Andrew Dinicola + Davis Felts6746% games+0.8% vs expected
Jack Baur + Davis Felts2543% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parv Mital
26W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Andrew Dinicola
45W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
4.40
Rawle Sue-Ho
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
Tyler Carroll
22W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
Gaurav Luther
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.25
4.5
Jack Baur
87W–51L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Davis Felts
63W–95L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Davis Humphries
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Brennan Doran
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
Peter Blankenship
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.93
Maxwell Gregson
23W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Thomas Hodges
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.