Teams

Camden

2023 Virginia Beach Adult 40 & Over · Virginia Beach Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-11vs Savino/HalterLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Camden / Kelly Long vs Sandra Savino / Stephanie Granger6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTammy Willett / Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz vs Tessa Robinson / Michella Newton6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLaura Smith / Christine Cowen vs Courtney Kellam / Anne Marie Burroughs0-6, 0-6
2023-07-05vs CoxWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Camden / Tammy Willett vs Cami Jordan / Jenna DeLigio6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-27vs NewtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie LeGrande / Tammy Willett vs Kimberly Cummings / Stacey Baum6-2, 6-3
2023-06-20vs Savino/HalterLost 01
L#2 DoublesErin Camden / Megan Farr vs Stephanie Granger / Rosanne Simon2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-13vs CoxSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTammy Willett / Christine Cowen vs Lori Cox / Cami Jordan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesErin Camden / Megan Farr vs Elizabeth Peterson / Courtney Morrall6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Kelly Long
published
3.82
Betty Domanski
published 4
3.60
Katie LeGrande
published
3.44
Tammy Willett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Megan Farr
published
3.37
Paige Caporicci
published
3.35
Erin Camden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Christine Cowen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Willett + Erin Camden251354% games+0.8% vs expected
Kelly Long + Betty Domanski3257% games−3.8% vs expected
Tammy Willett + Christine Cowen10553% games−5.3% vs expected
Erin Camden + Christine Cowen6058% gamesnot enough data
Betty Domanski + Christine Cowen5086% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Willett + Megan Farr314 matchesnot enough data
Megan Farr + Erin Camden134 matchesnot enough data
Paige Caporicci + Megan Farr303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Long
17W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Betty Domanski
102W–59L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Katie LeGrande
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Tammy Willett
136W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.44
Megan Farr
23W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
Paige Caporicci
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Erin Camden
141W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Christine Cowen
107W–97L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.