Teams

Jackson- Good Vibrations 6.0 18+MX W23

2023 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 6.0 Mx

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-02-17vs Altendahl 6.0 18+MX W23Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Bartone / Sarah Jackson vs Kelli Westenberg / James Reid6-2, 6-4
2023-01-20vs Oris 6.0 18+MX W23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Jackson / Joseph Laconic vs Paul Johnson / Lisa Andreasen3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesKendall Griffith / Sarah Jackson vs Kelly Meyer / Anthony Trettel3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mx have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Kristin Kroeger
published
3.23
Heather Legris
published
3.18
Rob Leonard
published
3.18
Mike Grimaldi
published
2.96
Shagu Heal
published
2.93
Pamela Snyder
published
2.88
2.88
Lorie Korpi
published
2.85
Kendall Griffith
published
2.75
Sarah Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Andrew Heal
published 3
Joseph Laconic
published
Mary Laconic
published
Michael Legris
published
Paul Bartone
published
Thomas Olson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Legris + Michael Legris3447% gamesnot enough data
Shagu Heal + Andrew Heal2346% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Jackson + Michael Legris213 matchesnot enough data
Mike Grimaldi + Danielle Grimaldi213 matchesnot enough data
Kendall Griffith + Kristin Kroeger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Kroeger
42W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.24
Heather Legris
26W–25L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Rob Leonard
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.18
Mike Grimaldi
12W–20L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Shagu Heal
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Pamela Snyder
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Danielle Grimaldi
29W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Lorie Korpi
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
Kendall Griffith
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Sarah Jackson
83W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Andrew Heal
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Joseph Laconic
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Laconic
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Legris
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Bartone
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Olson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.