Teams

Craig/Kruse- Net Hounds 18+ W23

2023 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-06vs Benowitz- ORCC 18+ W23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesScott Simpson / Thomas Godfrey vs Zachary Robins / Joshua Draves-Kellerman6-7, 2-6
2023-02-27vs Parker 18+ W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesScott Simpson / Thomas Godfrey vs Niklas Jorve / LaMont Robinson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-20Won 10
W#2 SinglesMichael Streater vs Chris Harrell6-1, 6-1
2023-02-06vs Sandozi- Minnesota SLICE 18+ W23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMichael Streater vs James Hwang7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2023-01-16Won 10
W#2 SinglesMichael Streater vs Ben Becker6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Jon Kruse
published
3.42
Michael Streater
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Richard Lassow
published
3.36
Jeff Sprinkel
published
3.31
Cody Zwiefelhofer
published 3.5
3.30
Jeff Craig
published
3.27
Jim Schwier
published
3.27
Robert MacHalek
published
3.27
Scott Simpson
published
3.20
Joshua Sillers
published
3.17
Thomas Godfrey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Arkady Shemyakin
published 3.5
3.13
Damian Langsweirdt
published 3.5
Matt Woelfel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Sprinkel + Robert MacHalek2343% games+4.8% vs expected
Robert MacHalek + Richard Lassow6849% games−3.5% vs expected
Thomas Godfrey + Richard Lassow134 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Sprinkel + Michael Streater213 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Godfrey + Robert MacHalek123 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Sillers + Robert MacHalek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Kruse
37W–38L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.56
Michael Streater
158W–101L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Richard Lassow
25W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Jeff Sprinkel
15W–24L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Cody Zwiefelhofer
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Jeff Craig
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
Jim Schwier
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Robert MacHalek
14W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Scott Simpson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Joshua Sillers
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Thomas Godfrey
28W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Arkady Shemyakin
12W–36L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Damian Langsweirdt
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Matt Woelfel
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.