Teams

GOLD RIVER RC 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-16vs ANTELOPE COMMUNITY PK 40AW3.5ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesVictoria Dowd / Laura Derry vs Vinh Sae / Rhona Wu2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Miguel vs Michele Reyes0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie Rock / Melissa Cook vs Tamara Jerd / Marion Sanders6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSandi Miller / Corinne Morton vs Lee Yoshikawa / Elvamae Frofunga6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Victoria Dowd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Susan L Haensel
published
3.37
Laurie Hanschu
published
3.31
Corinne Morton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Erenne Hedges
published 3.5
3.18
Debbie Rock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Marisa Schiffman
published
3.14
Laura Derry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Wilkes-Heieck
published
Jeanne Bovill
published
Julie Roe
published
Kristin Miguel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Robin Miotke
published
Sandi Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Plumb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Dowd + Laura Derry3453% games+1.2% vs expected
Marisa Schiffman + Susan L Haensel3546% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Dowd
32W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Susan L Haensel
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Laurie Hanschu
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Corinne Morton
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Erenne Hedges
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Rock
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Marisa Schiffman
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Laura Derry
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Janet Wilkes-Heieck
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanne Bovill
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Roe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Miguel
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Miotke
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandi Miller
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Plumb
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.