Teams

SpringPark RED/S. Nolen M3.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S M. League

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-06-21vs RGAC/Bredy M3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesDustin Hickey / Bryan Rollings vs Steve Arkell / John Brummett6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesThomas D'Amore / Trey Clemens vs Chris Nuytten / Trey DeMoville6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Masten / Chip Hodge vs Shawn Kruse / Adam Sensoy6-3, 6-3
2025-06-14vs Fretz/Balansay-Praslicka M3.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesConstantin Icleanu vs Zach Lester6-2, 6-0
2025-06-07vs Stonebridge/Gregg-Smith M3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesBryan Rollings / Dustin Hickey vs John Gregg / John Pesano6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesConstantin Icleanu vs Kirk Anderson6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeff Mussro / ryan beil vs Gregory Mccown / Loris Zaia5-7, 3-6
2025-05-31vs Huffhines/Hoang-Yeoh M3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesConstantin Icleanu vs Colin Wiley6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChip Hodge / Jeff Mussro vs Chris Kittrell / Winston Guillory1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBryan Rollings vs Haowei Gao5-7, 3-6
2025-05-17vs Canyon Creek/Romness-Erdmann M3.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesBryan Rollings / John Payne vs Doug Hipskind / Matt Lair5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesConstantin Icleanu vs David Romness6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrian Hauberg / Chip Hodge vs Stan Bradshaw / Sean Gurgle6-4, 6-1
2025-05-10vs SpringPark BLUE/S. Nolen M3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesDustin Hickey / Brian Hauberg vs Ethan Stegich / Robert Ketner6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesConstantin Icleanu vs Alex Campbell6-0, 6-1
W#2 Singlesryan beil vs Lee Hansen6-4, 6-4
2025-05-03vs LB Houston/Ramirez M3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDustin Hickey / John Payne vs Timothy Vo / Jerry Ramirez1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 Singlesryan beil vs Andres Beteta7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-26vs Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTrey Clemens / Thomas D'Amore vs David Thomas / Justin Epker3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesConstantin Icleanu vs James Brundage6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Bailey / ryan beil vs Victor Cobos / Omar Khan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-12vs Huffhines/Bonarji-Yeoh M3.0Lost 12
L#2 DoublesMark Bailey / Bryan Rollings vs Chandan Singh / Vivek Tiku3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesConstantin Icleanu vs Iranga Nagasinghe6-0, 6-2
L#3 Doublesryan beil / Chip Hodge vs Angshuman Dutta / Ryan Blackburn4-6, 0-6
2025-04-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Bailey / Chip Hodge vs Jeff McLeland / Cale Criswell2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S M. League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Constantin Icleanu
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.20
Diego Perez Palacios
usually #2 Singles 73%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.04
Brian Hauberg
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.04
Thomas D'Amore
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.96
Dustin Hickey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
John Masten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.73
Chip Hodge
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Bryan Rollings
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Jeff Mussro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Trey Clemens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
ryan beil
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Masten + Dustin Hickey4647% games+0.9% vs expected
Thomas D'Amore + John Masten7946% games−9.8% vs expected
Brian Hauberg + John Masten4348% gamesnot enough data
Chip Hodge + John Masten3350% gamesnot enough data
Brian Hauberg + Bryan Rollings5156% gamesnot enough data
Chip Hodge + Jeff Mussro0529% gamesnot enough data
Thomas D'Amore + Dustin Hickey314 matchesnot enough data
Chip Hodge + Brian Hauberg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Constantin Icleanu
14W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Diego Perez Palacios
18W–13L career · 11 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.20
3
Brian Hauberg
54W–36L career · type A · 15 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
Thomas D'Amore
23W–30L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Dustin Hickey
23W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
John Masten
23W–37L career · 10 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Chip Hodge
7W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Bryan Rollings
13W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Jeff Mussro
0W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trey Clemens
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
ryan beil
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.