Teams

Team 9

2023 NOVA Combo Mixed · NOVA Combo Mixed 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-26vs Team 2 Bailys BruisersWon 10
W#3 DoublesXIAOZHEN LIN / YANG LIU vs William Lefbom / Bonnie Lefbom6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-22vs Team 10Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Chen / XIAOZHEN LIN vs Luis Lopez / Ayrehl Davis6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-15vs Team 1 High RollersLost 01
L#1 DoublesQun Bi / FENG LI vs David Todd / Emma Shine2-6, 1-6
2023-10-10vs Team 5 PiF 7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesXIAOCHUN JI / Qun Bi vs Franklin Doan / Susan Velasco7-5, 3-6
2023-10-06vs Team 8 Net NutsLost 01
L#3 DoublesXIAOZHEN LIN / YANG LIU vs Scott Miller / Alison Ouchna6-7, 0-3
2023-09-23vs Team 6 VIVA ! 7.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesQun Bi / XIAOCHUN JI vs Alisha Kim / Jin Kim6-2, 5-5
L#2 DoublesYANG LIU / XIAOZHEN LIN vs Joan Kissal / Sandipp Rou Perepu3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Shan Wang
published
3.74
Winny Zhang
published
3.65
Yuan Zhang
published
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.56
XIAOZHEN LIN
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.52
Qun Bi
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.49
XIAOCHUN JI
published
3.29
Frank Wang
published 3.5
3.28
YANG LIU
published
3.27
FENG LI
published 3.5
3.23
Alan Zhang
published 3.5
3.08
Na Yu
published
Joy Wu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Na Yu + Frank Wang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shan Wang
31W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
Winny Zhang
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Yuan Zhang
48W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.65
4
Tana Jankowiak
103W–71L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
XIAOZHEN LIN
73W–47L career · 9 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Qun Bi
74W–62L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
XIAOCHUN JI
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Frank Wang
18W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
YANG LIU
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
FENG LI
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Alan Zhang
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Na Yu
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Joy Wu
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.