Teams

Vineyards

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-05vs FireBalls - Cambier - FerrettiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Renee DiGangi vs Kerry Wells / Chris Squires6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSharyn Chabot / Mary Caruso vs Sharon Bell / Lisa Bowden-Zumstein4-6, 3-6
2022-11-28vs Fiddlers Creek - FarnhamLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Heather Haynes vs Vicky Ramuta / Lisa LaSpina Bonevento3-6, 6-7
2022-11-26vs Naples Grande - PerrinoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Renee DiGangi vs Sandy Perrino / Marisa Fontana6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Margaret Callahan vs Lynn Olson / Lisa Lamorgese1-6, 1-6
2022-11-14vs Naples Bay Resort - BradyWon 21
W#1 DoublesRenee DiGangi / Margot Moran vs Meg Phelan / Gail Oroho6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTeri Solomon / Mary Caruso vs Michelle Foland / Maria Lafontaine2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Howe / Margaret Callahan vs Sarah Hecht / Shannon Monteiro6-1, 6-3
2022-11-07vs Fall Winners/ Marco YMCA - NelzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Renee DiGangi vs Trina Clarkson / Betsy Conte6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Ivone Pick vs Melissa Henderson / Marla Hoffman0-6, 0-6
2022-10-31vs Bonita National - WongLost 02
L#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Mary Caruso vs Roxana Scott / Laura Cirillo4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Howe / Heather Haynes vs Ellen DiLeo / Susan Lindberg4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-10-24vs Heritage Bay - K. KeillorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Renee DiGangi vs Cheryl Copps / Maureen Rennie6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Teri Solomon vs Kate Keillor / Sally Amato0-6, 2-6
2022-10-17vs GreyHawk - MooneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargot Moran / Renee DiGangi vs Michelle Ruffing / Nancy Molidor6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMary Caruso / Teri Solomon vs Toni Mooney / Tracy Cartwright6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelanie Howe / Heather Haynes vs Keryl Ball / Patricia Dau1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Renee DiGangi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.77
Sharyn Chabot
published
2.73
Mary Caruso
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Melanie Howe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Teri Solomon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Howe + Renee DiGangi5948% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Howe + Mary Caruso21041% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Howe + Teri Solomon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Renee DiGangi
99W–70L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.54
Sharyn Chabot
13W–28L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Mary Caruso
63W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Melanie Howe
23W–105L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Teri Solomon
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.