Teams

KY/LOU/BRAY/JORDAN

2025 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-10vs KY/LOU/MCCOYWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bray / Leslie Erena vs Paula Adkins / Rhonda Arnold6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Stofer / Heather Kushner vs Mary Shively / Robin Miller6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGlicelda Bradford / Cindy Bolen vs Debbie McCoy / Lynne Farner3-6, 2-6
2025-04-27vs KY/LOU/DENNIS/GROVELost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Kushner / Brenda Stofer vs Ellen Baldwin / Noel Kaufmann2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAmy Dishman / Leslie Erena vs Jennifer Reeder / Marti Wilkins7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bray / Cindy Bolen vs Jennifer Ottman / Lisa Jackson6-4, 6-2
2025-04-13vs KY/LOU/POLLOCK/MCGREGORWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bray / Amy Dishman vs Lisa McGregor / Jan Weimer7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKendra Purvis / Susan Maguire vs Alice Dant / Elaine Key6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSandra Sorrels / Carolyn Chou vs Carol Miller / Micah Harter3-6, 3-6
2025-04-05vs KY/LOU/HEFFLEYWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Dishman / Linda Ozier vs Nancy Fetz / Patty Coakley2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Bray / Heather Kushner vs Laura Linkous / Marci Boston6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGlicelda Bradford / Kendra Purvis vs Vicky Schaefer / Lisa Allen2-6, 3-6
2025-03-30vs KY/LOU/ST.CLAIR/BEANWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Bray / Leslie Erena vs Darla Radcliff / Margaret Hoffman6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Dishman / Linda Ozier vs Eleanor Lyons / Rhonda Wasinger6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrenda Stofer / Heather Kushner vs Jane St Clair / Sandra Heeke6-1, 6-2
2025-03-22vs KY/LOU/WOODS/MCINTYREWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Kushner / Brenda Stofer vs Lana McIntyre / Carmen Amato6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Dishman / Sherry Lafferty vs Anne Woods / Mary Sheridan6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Erena / Kristina Jordan vs Karen Voorhees / Ronette Brumfield6-3, 6-4
2025-03-14vs KY/LOU/HALLION/KERNLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bray / Cindy Bolen vs JoAnn Musselman / Michelle Wheeler3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGlicelda Bradford / Linda Ozier vs Sharon Dadds / Janis Kern6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Maguire / Brenda Stofer vs Patti Goldstein / Janice Smith5-7, 3-6
2025-03-08vs KY/LOU/CLARK/SHONKWILERLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bray / Sherry Lafferty vs Tange Skaggs / Renee Armstrong3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Chou / Brenda Stofer vs Pam Williams / Cheryl Dortch3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGlicelda Bradford / Linda Ozier vs Toni Renfro / Kimberly Kim6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Leslie Erena
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.88
Cindy Bolen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Amy Dishman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.76
Sherry Lafferty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Brenda Stofer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Heather Kushner
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Linda Ozier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Susan Maguire
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Glicelda Bradford
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Kendra Purvis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Carolyn Chou
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Sandra Sorrels
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Kristina Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Stofer + Heather Kushner14855% games+5.5% vs expected
Susan Maguire + Kendra Purvis1444% games−8.4% vs expected
Linda Ozier + Glicelda Bradford4160% gamesnot enough data
Susan Maguire + Amy Dishman213 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Erena + Kristina Jordan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Erena
23W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Cindy Bolen
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Amy Dishman
20W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
Sherry Lafferty
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Brenda Stofer
35W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Heather Kushner
21W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Linda Ozier
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Susan Maguire
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Glicelda Bradford
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Kendra Purvis
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Carolyn Chou
25W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Sandra Sorrels
10W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Kristina Jordan
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.