Teams

MC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-03vs LTFC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Orr / David Archuleta vs Reed Haddock / John Latta5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDean Ogawa / Tom Seeton vs Mark Shively / Geoffrey Walser2-6, 5-7
2023-07-27vs KC-RH REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Archuleta / Dan Parker vs Randy Rosenburg / J Douglas Wilson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Frisz / Dean Ogawa vs Alan Larson / Terry McDaniel2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAdelino Sanchez / Tom Seeton vs Alan Harris / Dan Strietelmeier2-6, 2-6
2023-07-20vs CK-M REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Archuleta / Dan Parker vs EDWARD PETERS / John Lawson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Frisz / Dean Ogawa vs Dale Chandler / Nicolas Newey4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-07-13vs LTFC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Archuleta / Mark Orr vs Reed Haddock / John Latta1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDean Ogawa / Tom Seeton vs Gordon Carpenter / Geoffrey Walser6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-07-06vs KC-RH REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Archuleta / Mark Orr vs Randy Rosenburg / Lance Willoughby4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Frisz / David Valenciano vs Alan Harris / Dan Strietelmeier6-4, 7-6
2023-06-29vs CK-M REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Frisz / Dean Ogawa vs Dale Chandler / John Lawson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Archuleta / Dan Parker vs EDWARD PETERS / Nicolas Newey0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Richard Frisz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Tom Seeton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dan Parker
published 3
2.71
Frank Rimlinger
published
2.66
Dean Ogawa
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.52
David Archuleta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.44
David Valenciano
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dean Ogawa + Richard Frisz5549% gamesnot enough data
Dean Ogawa + David Archuleta2450% gamesnot enough data
Dean Ogawa + Tom Seeton0533% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Richard Frisz
49W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Tom Seeton
58W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dan Parker
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Frank Rimlinger
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Dean Ogawa
50W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
2.5
David Archuleta
36W–121L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%44%56%
2.52
2.5
David Valenciano
8W–22L career · no lines in 2023
0%66%34%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.