Teams

WOCC 6.5 combo - Hamlin

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-08-24vs ACAC Hoefer/KrebsWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Broderick / Darlene Moehling vs Rebecca Wong / Alice Albright6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Darlene Moehling
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.42
Heather Drew
published
3.37
Laura Vetter
published
3.31
Jenny Norfleet
published
3.23
Jennifer Burris
published
3.20
Ainsley Crowell
published 3.5
3.15
Kelly Gregory
published
3.10
Cynthia Ryan
published 3
3.08
Zinie Sampson
published
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
3.01
Melissa Mathe
published
2.98
Joy Chenault
published
2.83
Stacy Curtis
published
2.83
Kristin Hamlin
published
2.81
Anne Scher
published 3
2.80
Katy Knierim
published
2.74
2.74
Amy Broderick
published 3
Nan McKenney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Vetter + Heather Drew2356% games−0.3% vs expected
Stacy Curtis + Catherine Matawaran3343% games−10.2% vs expected
Zinie Sampson + Kelly Gregory123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
110W–77L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Heather Drew
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Laura Vetter
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jenny Norfleet
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Jennifer Burris
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Ainsley Crowell
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Kelly Gregory
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Cynthia Ryan
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.10
Zinie Sampson
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Melissa Mathe
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Joy Chenault
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
2.98
Stacy Curtis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Kristin Hamlin
17W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Anne Scher
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Katy Knierim
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Catherine Matawaran
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Amy Broderick
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Nan McKenney
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.