Teams

GEPTA/Maese/18&over/4.0W

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#2 SinglesGisselle Araiza vs Rebecca Spencer Tavitas0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-09-24Lost 01
L#1 SinglesGisselle Araiza vs Rebecca Romero1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Maese/18&over/4.0W71301028272
2GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Delgado)(EPTC#1)71281230322
3GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Hufft)(FB)53241636335
4GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Tan)(EPTC#3)53241638304
5GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Pendergras)(EPCC)44231739336
6GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Missirian)(EPTC#2)44192148376
7GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Johnson)(EPTC#5)35182249353
8GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Cunningham)(TW)17112961412
9GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Phillips)(NMSU)000000
10GEPTA-4.0-Adult/W(Mattingly)(CCC)0833775467

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Artemisa Ortega
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.78
Delaney Kuehnel
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.74
Diana Lozano
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.64
Beatrice Maese
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.61
Bianca Loya
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 4
Erika Avila
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Erin Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Gisselle Araiza
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Hannah Juarez
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Juliet Welsh
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Liliana Cano
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
Lillian Ordonez
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Singles 15% · published
Niria Yepo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Maese-Bowling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Priscila Cano-Lopez
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Rocio Molina
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Rosa Chivardi-Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Vianka Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosa Chivardi-Ortiz + Artemisa Ortega7256% games+0.7% vs expected
Delaney Kuehnel + Hannah Juarez10170% gamesnot enough data
Niria Yepo + Lillian Ordonez10161% gamesnot enough data
Vianka Sanchez + Artemisa Ortega9064% gamesnot enough data
Beatrice Maese + Hannah Juarez2539% gamesnot enough data
Rocio Molina + Beatrice Maese1444% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Maese-Bowling + Vianka Sanchez1443% gamesnot enough data
Rocio Molina + Bianca Loya224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Artemisa Ortega
51W–49L career · 14 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Delaney Kuehnel
33W–14L career · 17 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Diana Lozano
13W–16L career · 11 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Beatrice Maese
74W–86L career · 11 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Bianca Loya
39W–31L career · 20 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Erika Avila
72W–37L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Erin Rivera
23W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gisselle Araiza
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Hannah Juarez
79W–45L career · 22 lines in 2024
not enough data
Juliet Welsh
38W–17L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Liliana Cano
55W–32L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lillian Ordonez
87W–40L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Niria Yepo
43W–29L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Maese-Bowling
18W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Priscila Cano-Lopez
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rocio Molina
78W–48L career · 38 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rosa Chivardi-Ortiz
78W–38L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vianka Sanchez
67W–50L career · 23 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.