Teams

Kiwi - Salvatore

2022 Brevard Adult 18 & Over-Early Start · 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-13vs TTC -TaylorWon 20
W#2 DoublesYvonne Salvatore / Ruby Nevin vs Kaye Vansickle / Suzanne Taylor6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllison Wyand / Julianne Moore vs Eileen Stapleton / Linda Hall6-3, 6-2
2021-12-06vs TTC - LeiterWon 10
W#2 DoublesYvonne Salvatore / Allison Wyand vs SARA BRESETTE / Emily Dwyer7-6, 6-4
2021-11-29vs Rockledge -Winner - KubeLost 01
L#3 DoublesAllison Wyand / Ashley Stanley vs Deena Helton / Karen Kelly6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2021-11-15vs Fee - LuerLost 01
L#1 DoublesYvonne Salvatore / Lisa Zizzo vs Deborah Phillips / Debra Grayson1-6, 0-6
2021-11-08vs Suntree - FordSplit 11
L#2 DoublesYvonne Salvatore / Ruby Nevin vs Lisa Stirtzinger / Tandy Baerst7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Petty / Allison Wyand vs Susie Camposano / Marianne Fraser0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-25vs TTC - LeiterLost 01
L#2 DoublesPamela Starkey / Allison Wyand vs Leslie Pankey / Jessica Martinez0-6, 4-6
2021-10-18vs Rockledge -Winner - KubeLost 01
L#2 DoublesAllison Wyand / Kathleen Groff vs April Sanders / Mary Jo Pecoraro1-6, 2-6
2021-10-11vs Fee - LuerWon 20
W#1 DoublesYvonne Salvatore / Tracey Draper vs Angela Hofmann / Renee Jiannine6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Petty / Allison Wyand vs Marisa Rushin / Daricca Facciobene6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Allison Wyand
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.07
Tracey Draper
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.91
Julianne Moore
published
2.83
Ashley Stanley
published 3
2.80
Yvonne Salvatore
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Kathleen Groff
published
ANITA CARBONE
published
Ruby Nevin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Draper + Allison Wyand71047% games+0.4% vs expected
Tracey Draper + Yvonne Salvatore1837% gamesnot enough data
Yvonne Salvatore + Allison Wyand3348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Wyand
69W–57L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Tracey Draper
69W–115L career · 5 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Julianne Moore
22W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Ashley Stanley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Yvonne Salvatore
97W–113L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Kathleen Groff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
ANITA CARBONE
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruby Nevin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.