Teams

NNM 3.5M TCA - Meiers

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over League - NNM · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-03-27vs NNM 3.5M STC - HarrisonWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Baggerly / John Hellier vs Jeff Abes / Norm Zwail6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichael Scisco vs Andrew Tulchin6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrian Carter / Scott Webster vs James Lewis / Gregory Smith6-4, 6-4
2022-03-19vs NNM 3.5M STC - HarrisonWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Baggerly / Robert Craff vs James Lewis / Doug Lougee6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMichael Scisco vs John Dunbar6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Finley / John Hellier vs Brian Nelson / Steven Talbot6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Foster / Sandy McNeill vs Jeff Abes / Norm Zwail2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
3.69
Brian Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Michael Scisco
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
Alan Blair
published 4
3.48
David Baggerly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Charles Finley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
John Hellier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Andrew Foster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eric Meiers
published 3.5
3.09
Robert Craff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy McNeill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Webster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Finley + David Baggerly6255% games+13.5% vs expected
Brian Carter + Alan Blair5168% games+10.4% vs expected
Brian Carter + Andrew Foster4157% games+6.4% vs expected
David Baggerly + Michael Scisco5352% games+5.9% vs expected
David Baggerly + Alan Blair8360% games+4.3% vs expected
Charles Finley + John Hellier5554% games+1.1% vs expected
David Baggerly + Christopher Howell3350% games+0.0% vs expected
Charles Finley + Robert Craff6751% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Howell
58W–43L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Brian Carter
112W–49L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Michael Scisco
65W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Alan Blair
79W–102L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
David Baggerly
107W–84L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Charles Finley
73W–56L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
John Hellier
62W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Andrew Foster
114W–67L career · 1 line in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Eric Meiers
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Craff
38W–40L career · 1 line in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Sandy McNeill
24W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Webster
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.