Teams

HCC Schneider

2025 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#3 DoublesEugene Martineau / Ken Chin vs Patrick Rairigh / Robert Chen6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEugene Martineau / Srinivasulu Navuluri vs Bill McLendon / Todd Vandeberg6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJose Alomar / William Arfsten vs Jason Lichtman / Mark Gibson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEugen Schwarz / Jacob Munch vs Charles Constantine / Freddy Russian6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGvozden Dokic / Ken Chin vs KEVIN JOHNSON / Todd Abrams4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Erik Breitenbach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Brian Stone
published 4
3.88
Eugen Schwarz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Paul Zack
published
3.83
William Arfsten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Jose Alomar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Eugene Martineau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Sylvain Gauthier
published
3.49
Jacob Munch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
3.43
Ken Chin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Steven Friedman
published
Gvozden Dokic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sylvain Gauthier + Jose Alomar5256% games+5.5% vs expected
Jose Alomar + William Arfsten7158% games−0.7% vs expected
Sylvain Gauthier + Paul Zack2348% gamesnot enough data
Brian Stone + Steven Friedman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erik Breitenbach
257W–136L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.98
4
Brian Stone
26W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Eugen Schwarz
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Paul Zack
31W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
William Arfsten
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Jose Alomar
15W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Eugene Martineau
57W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Sylvain Gauthier
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Jacob Munch
24W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Srinivasulu Navuluri
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Steven Friedman
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Gvozden Dokic
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.