Teams

Los Realengos - CTH

Mixed 40 & Over 2026 · 2026 40 & Over Mixed 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-22vs Hacienda Del SurLost 03
L#1 DoublesTom Bures / Sandra Ortiz vs Carlos Cuevas / Jaynet Rivera2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Mirandes / Hector Vera vs Janet Ortiz / Humberto Lizardi2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesManuel Principe Acosta / Karina Baez vs Alice Perez / Norberto Marchany Lopez1-6, 0-6
2026-08-16vs Dorado Del MarLost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Bures / Sandra Ortiz vs Humberto Quintana / Melissa Campos0-6, 2-6
2026-08-02vs Rio Mar- Pablo RomeroLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Colon Nieves / Manuel Principe Acosta vs Annette Pi / Juan Zorrilla Melendez4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Ortiz / Noel Santana vs Thynia Rivera / PABLO ROMERO1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 40 & Over Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Karina Baez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Noel Santana
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Sandra Ortiz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Tom Bures
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Ana Rivera
published 3.5
2.97
Monica Mirandes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Manuel Principe Acosta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.95
Hector Vera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Javier Torrens
published
2.82
Karen Colon Nieves
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Manuel Principe Acosta + Karina Baez0635% games−20.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karina Baez
17W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Noel Santana
43W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Sandra Ortiz
94W–78L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Tom Bures
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Ana Rivera
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Monica Mirandes
5W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Manuel Principe Acosta
45W–89L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Hector Vera
22W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Javier Torrens
15W–36L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
Karen Colon Nieves
17W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.