Teams

Shipley 40+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-26vs Will Play For Chardonnay 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesRosemary Prola / Kathy Tuckey vs Kimberly Price / Debbie Tow6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJill Comeaux / Judi Humpert vs Ilene Fishkind / Susan Flaherty6-3, 6-3
2022-07-21vs Sets In the City 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Tuckey / Pam Franks vs Jessica Butcher / Jennifer Lee6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRosemary Prola / Mary Ellen Staggers vs Mary Arnold / Meghan Reinhart4-6, 2-6
2022-07-08vs Smashed 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJill Comeaux / Denise Berger vs Angie Norris / Dina Rachuba3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRosemary Prola / Kelly Murray vs Sanghee Lee / Gina Seyfried3-6, 1-6
2022-06-30vs Just Wanna Play 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesJill Comeaux / Judi Humpert vs Betty Wang / Karin Johansen4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Murray / Kathy Tuckey vs Kathy Greene / STACEY WOLFE6-4, 6-2
2022-06-29vs MacAttack 3.5 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Comeaux / Judi Humpert vs Jennie Kim / Debra MacDonald2-6, 2-6
2022-06-18vs Oaksmith 3.5 40+Split 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Tuckey / Judi Humpert vs Elisa Oaksmith / Nancy Trimble6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJill Comeaux / Rosemary Prola vs Noelle Lynch / Sandy Segrist3-6, 1-6
2022-06-05vs Casual Sets 40+Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKathy Tuckey vs Elizabeth McLeod6-7, 5-5
2022-05-23vs Super SmashLost 01
L#1 DoublesVickie Carroll / Jill Comeaux vs Cheryl Cook-Auerbach / Sandy Friedman4-6, 4-6
2022-05-20vs Sparks 40+Won 21
W#1 DoublesJill Comeaux / Judi Humpert vs Anne Swartz / Jean Schaffer6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKathy Tuckey vs Mary Klyap0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTrish Shipley / Rosemary Prola vs Deborah Carpenter / Kim Steffen7-5, 6-3
2022-05-15vs Shotmakers 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Comeaux / Rosemary Prola vs Brenda Crowe / Diane Miller2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Darcie Hammer
published 3.5
3.08
Pam Franks
published
3.07
Kathy Tuckey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Jill Comeaux
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Rosemary Prola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Tuckey + Pam Franks123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darcie Hammer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Pam Franks
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Kathy Tuckey
29W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Jill Comeaux
19W–39L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Rosemary Prola
44W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.