Teams

Richards/Memphis

2024 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 4.0 Women 18 & over

16 players · average NTRP 3.64 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-28vs Rudd/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrace Bann / Teresa Santiago vs Whitney Hayes / Stephanie White6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEdith Clark / Bianca Clayton vs Leslie Wilkinson / Jess Flanders4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLauren Thornton vs Emily Koelsch6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-21vs Ivey/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesOmitope Taylor / Jordana Berger vs Kristin Dannemiller / Laura Fortenberry1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesZakiya Kelley vs Megan Guarini0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBianca Clayton / Edith Clark vs Cindy Miller / Rachel Baker5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesLauren Thornton vs Autumn Rich6-3, 6-3
2024-04-14vs Wenzler/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Sharp / Omitope Taylor vs Lynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesZakiya Kelley vs Cameron Seay2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesVenecca Green / Edith Clark vs Elizabeth Bran / Shea Shelton2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-07vs Woodmansee/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandra Richards / Lauren Thornton vs Kiersten Schnacke / Lauren Wiuff5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesZakiya Kelley vs Caroline Graves7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-24vs Hyde/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesDee Bias / Melissa Rodriguez Perez vs Lynn Davis / Robin Barringer1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJordana Berger / Ann Marie Wallace vs Tracy Duff / Claire Fowler1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Richards / Lauren Thornton vs Emily Gallops / Nelli Golmeeva3-6, 1-6
2024-03-17vs Bratton/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesDee Bias / Melissa Rodriguez Perez vs Jennifer Magee / Vonya Day6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGrace Bann / Teresa Santiago vs Juliet Wagner / Sophia Runer Folk4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesZakiya Kelley vs Vanessa Nieto2-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Marie Wallace / Jordana Berger vs Kelly Damico / Melony Bratton7-5, 6-3
2024-03-03vs Wright/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesBianca Clayton / Venecca Green vs Chris Danielson / Ashley Baur4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Richards / Lauren Thornton vs Brooks Klepper / Courtney Wright1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesZakiya Kelley vs Kelley Smith3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMina Chung / Ann Marie Wallace vs Murre Foster / Elizabeth Smith2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Melissa Rodriguez Perez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Gloria Hicks
published 4
3.53
Bianca Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.51
Jordana Berger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Dee Bias
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Grace Bann
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
Edith Clark
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jacqueline Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Omitope Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Ann Marie Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Mina Chung
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Sandra Richards
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Lauren Thornton
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Teresa Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Venecca Green
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Zakiya Kelley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grace Bann + Gloria Hicks2450% games+8.8% vs expected
Bianca Clayton + Gloria Hicks123 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Richards + Lauren Thornton123 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Santiago + Grace Bann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Rodriguez Perez
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Gloria Hicks
17W–32L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Bianca Clayton
4W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jordana Berger
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Dee Bias
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Grace Bann
50W–51L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Edith Clark
2W–5L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Jacqueline Sharp
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Omitope Taylor
7W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ann Marie Wallace
5W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Mina Chung
7W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
Sandra Richards
6W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.71
Lauren Thornton
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Santiago
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Venecca Green
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zakiya Kelley
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.