Teams

TOHS.Lowrance

2023 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-23vs TOHS.IrishSplit 11
L#2 SinglesKimberly Latzy vs Xinyang Dong2-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesTracy Lowrance vs Dongbo Lu6-2, 6-3
2023-08-16vs TOC.ScagnelliWon 20
W#2 SinglesTracy Lowrance vs Erin Rabbitt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKimberly Latzy vs Devon Wadsworth6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-09vs APEX.CaiLost 01
L#2 SinglesKimberly Latzy vs Jennifer Waychoff2-6, 4-6
2023-07-18vs CAS.KotcherSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTracy Lowrance vs Jennifer Kuzma2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesKimberly Latzy vs Christine Ulses6-1, 6-2
2023-07-12vs PW.ReinickerLost 01
L#2 SinglesKatie Klingemann vs Shayna Bolton1-6, 3-6
2023-06-28vs MD.LigayWon 10
W#3 SinglesTracy Lowrance vs Drew Long0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-21vs PW.KraftWon 20
W#1 SinglesKimberly Latzy vs Erika Lipkin7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Deirdre Mladsi6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Anna Bentley
published 4
3.32
Susan Newton
published
3.24
Kimberly Latzy
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Tracy Lowrance
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Katie Klingemann
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.90
Kristen Henderson
published
2.87
Tracy Grasser
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Lisa Brandman
published
Anne Grimm
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Grasser + Tracy Lowrance5350% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Grasser + Kimberly Latzy7160% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Lowrance + Kimberly Latzy7080% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Bentley
13W–22L career · type A · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
Susan Newton
30W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Kimberly Latzy
111W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Tracy Lowrance
185W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Katie Klingemann
97W–62L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Kristen Henderson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Tracy Grasser
146W–131L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
Lisa Brandman
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Anne Grimm
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.