Teams

JOHNSON RANCH 55AW6.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Ann Gudmann
published 3.5
3.37
Maribel Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Heather Craig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Shelley Quomri
published
3.28
Paulette Kraft
published
3.26
Lauren Pugh
published
3.23
Martha Garcia
published
3.20
Rebecca Domeier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Margie Sasaura
published
3.15
Lori Grbac
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Leigh McNeely
published
2.89
Kathleen Mott
published
2.82
Debra Harris
published 3
2.82
Deborah Bickel
published 3
2.59
Janice Moore
published
2.33
Julie Owens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Pugh + Shelley Quomri5547% games−5.3% vs expected
Margie Sasaura + Paulette Kraft213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Gudmann
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Maribel Gregory
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Heather Craig
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Shelley Quomri
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Paulette Kraft
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Lauren Pugh
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Martha Garcia
20W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Rebecca Domeier
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Margie Sasaura
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Lori Grbac
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Leigh McNeely
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kathleen Mott
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Debra Harris
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Deborah Bickel
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Janice Moore
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Julie Owens
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.