Teams

Marks-Wheeler/Chattanooga

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Chattanooga · 4.0 women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-09vs Arrowsmith-DeVaney/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoni Wolfe / Melee Gautreau vs Pamela Wilson / Lisa Govan7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLorraine Marks / Beverly Geismar vs Caroline Bentley / Lane Park6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBarbara Zellner / Rebecca Stimson vs Amy Arrowsmith / Amy Weeks2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-03vs Arrowsmith-DeVaney/ChattanoogaLost 12
W#1 DoublesLori Smith / Joni Wolfe vs Alison Matera / Cornele Thomas6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanice Forsyth / Beverly Geismar vs Lindsay Moore / Amy Arrowsmith1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRegina Hickl-Szabo / Lorraine Marks vs Lisa Govan / Melinda Ellis3-6, 3-6
2026-05-02vs Arrowsmith-DeVaney/ChattanoogaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoni Wolfe / Lori Smith vs Lindsay Moore / Melinda Ellis6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBeverly Geismar / Lorraine Marks vs Lisa Govan / Pamela Wilson2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCorinne Hennen / Regina Hickl-Szabo vs Lane Park / Marialice Hatch3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-12vs Arrowsmith-DeVaney/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Stimson / Janice Forsyth vs Amy Arrowsmith / Lindsay Moore7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDonna Coleman / Joni Wolfe vs Pamela Wilson / Amy Weeks6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRegina Hickl-Szabo / Corinne Hennen vs Alison Matera / Julia Jones6-4, 6-2
2026-03-28vs Arrowsmith-DeVaney/ChattanoogaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Smith / Judy Nowotarski vs Lindsay Moore / Amy Arrowsmith5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJanice Forsyth / Rebecca Stimson vs Pamela Wilson / Ann Epps6-1, 6-1
2026-03-22vs Arrowsmith-DeVaney/ChattanoogaWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Coleman / Judy Nowotarski vs Lindsay Moore / Amy Arrowsmith6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLorraine Marks / Lori Smith vs Alison Matera / Marialice Hatch6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Im / Barbara Zellner vs Julia Jones / Lane Park6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Marks-Wheeler/Chattanooga4212613132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dana Wheeler
published 4.5
3.93
Rebecca Stimson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Barbara Zellner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Donna Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Beverly Geismar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Janice Forsyth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Joni Wolfe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Melee Gautreau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Regina Hickl-Szabo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Corinne Hennen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Linda Im
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Lorraine Marks
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Nowotarski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
McKellar Newsom
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Coleman + McKellar Newsom213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Wheeler
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Stimson
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Barbara Zellner
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Donna Coleman
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Beverly Geismar
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Janice Forsyth
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Joni Wolfe
46W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.61
Melee Gautreau
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Regina Hickl-Szabo
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.36
3.5
Corinne Hennen
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Im
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.20
Lorraine Marks
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Judy Nowotarski
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
McKellar Newsom
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.