Teams

MTC - Hamner

2026 Combo 55 & Over Men Night - Mobile · 7.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-02vs MTC - KendallSplit 11
W#1 DoublesReggie Oyler / Michael Hamner vs Thomas Lockard / Sean O'Neill6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGerald Still / Andy Falls vs Fred Cooper / Mark Davis3-6, 5-7
2026-08-12vs MTC - KendallWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohnny Still / Brian Lindsey vs Richard Hice / Howard Galloway II6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesReggie Oyler / David Wallace vs Fred Cooper / Ken Daugherty6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGeorge Coate / Michael Hamner vs Agus Handoko / Mark Davis6-4, 6-1
2026-08-05vs MTC - KendallSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGerald Still / David Wallace vs Richard Hice / Howard Galloway II4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMichael Hamner / Brian Lindsey vs Thomas Lockard / Vincent Sciame7-6
2026-07-29vs MTC - KendallWon 21
L#1 DoublesGerald Still / Brian Lindsey vs Richard Hice / Ken Daugherty6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGeorge Coate / Michael Hamner vs Fred Cooper / Gregory Kendall6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Smith / Andy Falls vs Agus Handoko / Sean O'Neill4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-23vs MTC - KendallSplit 11
W#1 DoublesReggie Oyler / Michael Hamner vs Fred Cooper / Gregory Kendall6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Smith / Andy Falls vs Agus Handoko / Sean O'Neill1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTC - Hamner227512104
2MTC - Kendall225715105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Johnny Still
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Reggie Oyler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
George Coate
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Gerald Still
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Michael Hamner
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Brian Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Andy Falls
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hamner + Reggie Oyler4253% games+1.4% vs expected
George Coate + Michael Hamner213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Lindsey + Andy Falls303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Johnny Still
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.87
Reggie Oyler
15W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
George Coate
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Gerald Still
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
Michael Hamner
45W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Brian Lindsey
32W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Andy Falls
21W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.