Teams

CCRC-Morris8.5

2026 CSRATA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Women 8.5 Combo

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-28vs CCRC BarksdaleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSue McCollum / Kristin Risher vs Jeannette Hammers / Julea Hovey4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany McLeod / Andrea Mercer vs Cheri Hain / Denise Warkenthien2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSamantha Evans / Symmes Johnson vs Kelly Mercier / Kelly Anne Moore4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-07-27vs CCRC BarksdaleWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrittany McLeod / Andrea Mercer vs Julea Hovey / Denise Warkenthien4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSymmes Johnson / Sue McCollum vs Kelly Mercier / Kelly Anne Moore6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Calhoun / Kristin Risher vs Kristen Dimm / Ellyn Gilbert3-6, 4-6
2026-06-22vs CCRC BarksdaleWon 30
W#1 DoublesSymmes Johnson / Sue McCollum vs Brennan Ferguson / Kelly Mercier7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Baggett / Andrea Mercer vs Kay Barksdale / Deanie Barksdale4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeisa Tebbs / Hannah Clifford vs Kristen Dimm / Denise Warkenthien6-2, 6-2
2026-06-15vs CCRC BarksdaleLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Baggett / Symmes Johnson vs Brennan Ferguson / Julea Hovey4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Calhoun / Andrea Mercer vs Traci Davis / Cheri Hain3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSamantha Evans / Sue McCollum vs Kristen Dimm / Kelly Anne Moore3-6, 2-6
2026-06-08vs CCRC BarksdaleWon 21
L#1 DoublesSamantha Evans / Andrea Mercer vs Kelly Mercier / Kay Barksdale0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrittany McLeod / Kristin Risher vs Kristen Dimm / Cheri Hain6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHannah Clifford / Leisa Tebbs vs Julea Hovey / Kelly Anne Moore6-3, 6-2
2026-05-18vs CCRC BarksdaleLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Clifford / Symmes Johnson vs Brennan Ferguson / Kelly Mercier4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAndrea Mercer / Leisa Tebbs vs Kay Barksdale / Traci Davis3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrittany McLeod / Sandra Patten vs Jeannette Hammers / Kelly Anne Moore6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-04vs CCRC BarksdaleWon 21
L#1 DoublesSymmes Johnson / Brittany McLeod vs Brennan Ferguson / Julea Hovey2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Baggett / Andrea Mercer vs Holly Gilbert / Denise Warkenthien6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKristin Risher / Leisa Tebbs vs Kay Barksdale / Deanie Barksdale6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-27vs CCRC BarksdaleLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Clifford / Kristin Risher vs Jeannette Hammers / Denise Warkenthien2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Evans / Sue McCollum vs Kay Barksdale / Ellyn Gilbert0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Baggett / Brittany McLeod vs Brennan Ferguson / Julea Hovey2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 8.5 Combo
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCRC Barksdale4415922189
2CCRC-Morris8.54491534235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Symmes Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.10
Andrea Mercer
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.94
Kristin Risher
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.87
Sue McCollum
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.82
Brittany McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.81
Leisa Tebbs
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Heather Baggett
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.62
Lori Morris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Julie Calhoun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sandra Patten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Baggett + Brittany McLeod4163% games+7.6% vs expected
Heather Baggett + Lori Morris3251% games−2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Symmes Johnson
4W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Andrea Mercer
4W–9L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
Kristin Risher
2W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
Sue McCollum
12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Brittany McLeod
28W–15L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Leisa Tebbs
36W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Heather Baggett
23W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
Lori Morris
26W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Julie Calhoun
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Sandra Patten
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.