Teams

Nixon - Legacy Lakes

Sandhills Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Combo 55 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-08vs Irby - CCNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Hicks / Del Metcalf vs Lisa Cook / Valerie Georgevitch2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Barnhardt / Ann Tucker vs Sarah McAdams / Louise Lucas7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCindy Garrison / Patricia Zoellner vs Victoria Adkins / Murtis Worth0-6, 2-6
2026-08-01vs Harris - Lawn and TennisWon 30
W#1 DoublesDel Metcalf / Donna Hicks vs Marcy Isenhart / Lynn Goldhammer6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Barnhardt / Ann Tucker vs Amy Hastings / Lori Hercules6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Nixon / Cindy Garrison vs Lynn Floyd / Sandra Florell6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 55 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Del Metcalf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Ann Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cynthia Hall
published 3.5
3.20
Lisa Nixon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Sandra Barnhardt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Jen Barton
published
2.96
Donna Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Patricia Zoellner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cindy Garrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Del Metcalf + Ann Tucker16274% games+14.1% vs expected
Lisa Nixon + Del Metcalf15558% games+0.3% vs expected
Lisa Nixon + Sandra Barnhardt3847% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Barnhardt + Jen Barton314 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Barnhardt + Patricia Zoellner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Del Metcalf
165W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.75
3.5
Ann Tucker
63W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Cynthia Hall
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Lisa Nixon
99W–156L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3
Sandra Barnhardt
25W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Jen Barton
22W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
Donna Hicks
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Patricia Zoellner
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
3
Cindy Garrison
1W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.