Teams

Partagas/Chapman/Halvorsen 6.5 Combo 65s Mon

2023 Piedmont Combo 65 & Over · Women 6.5 Mon PM 65 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-02vs Cober 3.5 Combo 65 MonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Deterding / Mariann Van Ryen vs Janice Young / Betsy Wood3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Cole / Bobbi McEntee vs Anne Cober / Deborah Elston6-0, 6-1
2023-09-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesBobbi McEntee / Michelle Harris vs Laura Reilly / Suzanne Ponting6-1, 6-2
2023-08-28vs Redding 6.5 Combo 65s MonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMariann Van Ryen / Barbara Cole vs Janet Craft / Debra Hendricks6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-21vs Titzer/Jones 6.5 Combo 65s MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Deterding / Mariann Van Ryen vs Linda Shuster / Cindy Lynk1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesMariann Van Ryen / Bobbi McEntee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 Mon PM 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Judy Eaton
published
3.24
Patty Dutton
published
3.17
Michelle Harris
published
2.94
2.94
Patricia Barman
published
2.86
Betty Smith
published 3
2.85
Ila Rosenthal
published 3
2.83
Linda Chapman
published
2.80
Faye Halvorsen
published 3
2.65
Mariann Van Ryen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Lori Partagas
published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
2.43
Bobbi McEntee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Harris + Patricia Barman033 matchesnot enough data
Linda Chapman + Faye Halvorsen033 matchesnot enough data
Linda Chapman + Patty Dutton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judy Eaton
39W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Patty Dutton
19W–23L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Michelle Harris
19W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.17
3
Elizabeth Deterding
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
2.94
Patricia Barman
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Betty Smith
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
Linda Chapman
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Faye Halvorsen
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Mariann Van Ryen
121W–99L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lori Partagas
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
2.63
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Bobbi McEntee
87W–103L career · 3 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.