Teams

LA - Full Metal Racquets

2024 Weekday Spring Women's Doubles - Local League Only - LA · LA - Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-21vs LA - Griffith Park LobcatsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlexis Cittadine / Cindy Gaytan vs Katy Burgess / Sharon Monempour0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Pashkow / Cindy Shih vs Jo Ann Thrailkill / Samira Sizdahkhani4-6, 2-6
2024-05-15vs LA - LATCWon 10
W#3 DoublesApril Thrun / Cindy Shih vs Catharine Soros / Beverly Gatica4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-25vs LA - LATCWon 10
W#3 DoublesApril Thrun / Susan Moreno vs Beverly Gatica / Nora Suk6-2, 6-1
2024-04-19vs LA - Griffith Park LobcatsLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Shih / Susan Moreno vs Sachi Ford / Christine Whigham2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Nicole Martino
published
3.37
Shelly Janger
published
3.25
Kate Jensen
published
3.21
Alexis Cittadine
published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Weaver
published
3.14
Jennifer Demoff
published
3.12
Cindy Gaytan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Linda Tyrer
published
3.08
Kathleen Dohrmann
published
2.79
Cindy Shih
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Susan Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
April Thrun
published 3
Julie Rockwell
published
Larissa Dooley
published
Sonia Dollero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Demoff + Linda Tyrer5352% games+4.5% vs expected
Alexis Cittadine + Shelly Janger3246% gamesnot enough data
Kate Jensen + Shelly Janger224 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Gaytan + Kathleen Dohrmann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Martino
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Shelly Janger
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kate Jensen
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Alexis Cittadine
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Elizabeth Weaver
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
Jennifer Demoff
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Cindy Gaytan
67W–83L career · 1 line in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Linda Tyrer
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kathleen Dohrmann
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.08
3
Cindy Shih
69W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Susan Moreno
26W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.74
3
April Thrun
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Julie Rockwell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Larissa Dooley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sonia Dollero
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.