Teams

3-JYoung-Eno-40+3.0 Singles-Eno

2023 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-13vs 7-KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Deborah Hertzog6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Kensy Ryan4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJonda Young vs Kelly Jernigan6-2, 7-5
2023-07-06vs 6-NDolan-HRSplit 11
W#2 SinglesJonda Young vs Glenda Dinyari6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Tina Prinstein4-6, 2-6
2023-07-05vs 1-GLoFrese-Eno-40+3.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPenny Kraft vs Alexa Hartenstein4-6, 3-6
2023-06-29vs 2-JDeConto/AKlein-EnoLost 03
L#1 SinglesPenny Kraft vs Courtney Carey0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Santae Cooper2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJonda Young vs Angela Davis3-6, 6-7
2023-06-15vs 5-KTravis-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesKristin Isaacs vs Tracey Maurer0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJonda Young vs Sloane Wootton6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-08vs 4-KLAAN-Eno-40+3.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKristin Isaacs vs Mary T Long0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesLoralie Bible vs Kinsey Wennerstrom3-6, 2-6
2023-06-01Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKristin Isaacs vs Kelly Moore4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJanet Ranheim vs Caroline Irish6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Hannah Harvey
published
2.80
Kristin Isaacs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Janet Ranheim
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.67
Penny Kraft
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.62
Matalaba Napier
published
2.36
Jonda Young
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Kraft + Kristin Isaacs134 matchesnot enough data
Jonda Young + Loralie Bible213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
Hannah Harvey
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Kristin Isaacs
111W–164L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Janet Ranheim
108W–113L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Penny Kraft
120W–326L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Matalaba Napier
11W–21L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
2.62
2.5
Jonda Young
93W–183L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%83%17%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.