Teams

STL/Rhoads 65 6.0M

2025 Adult 65 & Over · Men 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Men 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Rhoads 65 6.0M000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
John Schless
published
2.88
Darwin Haskins
published 3
2.71
Paul Olivo
published
2.67
Trey Shaffer
published
2.65
Steve Uelhof
published
2.63
Tom Rhoads
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Ronald Froman
published
Jim Kimminau
published
Mark Weiss
published
Michael Comens
published
Michael Lackey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Cremer
published
Timothy Bremer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darwin Haskins + John Schless5349% games+1.7% vs expected
Michael Lackey + Richard Cremer1738% games−4.9% vs expected
Michael Lackey + Trey Shaffer033 matchesnot enough data
Steve Uelhof + Timothy Bremer213 matchesnot enough data
Tom Rhoads + Ronald Froman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Schless
64W–139L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Darwin Haskins
106W–134L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Paul Olivo
44W–52L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Trey Shaffer
53W–129L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Steve Uelhof
81W–91L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Tom Rhoads
55W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.63
Ronald Froman
49W–70L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
Jim Kimminau
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Weiss
1W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Comens
3W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Lackey
11W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Cremer
54W–77L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Bremer
32W–35L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.