Teams

TRS:Schulze

2026 VT Tri-Level Women · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP / VERMONT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESB:Strausser000000
2TRS:Schulze000000
3BTC:Alliance:Cawley000000
4ESB:Smash Hits:Wygmans000000
5ESB:Melen000000
6ESB:AHA!:Estey000000
7MIT:Singles Sisters:Dunn000000
8ESB:Smith:Parks000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Stephanie Rouleau
published
3.63
Sue Schulze
published
3.62
Erika Furey
published
3.47
Monika Granata
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Rouleau
42W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
Sue Schulze
53W–20L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Erika Furey
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Monika Granata
37W–27L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.