Teams

LATA40/Mathews/RC

2023 Combo 40 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 6.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Page Ream
published
3.50
Susan Mathews
published
3.48
Jane Roberts
published
3.39
Cindy Bane
published 3.5
3.37
Debe Hanners
published 3.5
3.34
Susie Leroy
published
3.27
Teresa Tracy
published
3.23
Jennifer Wild
published
3.21
Leslie Downs
published
3.17
Wendel Franklin
published
3.12
Libby Hagins
published
2.98
Tammie King
published
2.96
Anne Belue
published 3
2.89
Reka Corley
published
2.71
Vandrea Lang
published
2.70
Aimee Zmroczek
published 3
2.70
Marybeth Meyers
published
Jessica Hallman
published
Tracy Huffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Leroy + Cindy Bane6072% games+14.2% vs expected
Page Ream + Cindy Bane19163% games+4.9% vs expected
Debe Hanners + Cindy Bane5158% games+1.1% vs expected
Debe Hanners + Jane Roberts26661% games−2.8% vs expected
Susie Leroy + Jennifer Wild5257% games−3.5% vs expected
Teresa Tracy + Jane Roberts5062% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Tracy + Debe Hanners134 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Downs + Jennifer Wild123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Page Ream
78W–37L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
Susan Mathews
39W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jane Roberts
51W–14L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Cindy Bane
81W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Debe Hanners
73W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Susie Leroy
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
Teresa Tracy
44W–23L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennifer Wild
14W–26L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Leslie Downs
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Wendel Franklin
27W–14L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Libby Hagins
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
Tammie King
40W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Anne Belue
47W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
2.96
Reka Corley
35W–40L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Vandrea Lang
20W–37L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Aimee Zmroczek
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Marybeth Meyers
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Jessica Hallman
44W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Huffman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.