Teams

Whiteley/OFRC 18s 7.5M Combo Tues Pm

2026 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 18 & Over Men Tues PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-25vs Hilliard 18s 7.5M Combo Tues. PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGonzalo Quindos / Michael McGovern vs Curry Wilkinson / Huy Ho6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRichard Emmendorfer / Andrew Elsdon vs Tony Lancaster / Ken Questell7-5, 6-1
2026-08-18vs Cochran 18s 7.5M Combo Tues PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Palmer / Kevin Grubb vs Brad MacDonald / Brandon Weymann3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael McGovern / Andrew Elsdon vs Eric Nocera / Anthony Jackson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Boylston / Danny van Fleet vs Matthew Dunning / Samraat Saxena3-6, 0-6
2026-08-11vs Lara 18s 7.5M Combo Tues PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Lough / Creighton Vaught vs Andres Llausas / Rohit Rajwade2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGonzalo Quindos / Richard Emmendorfer vs Ajay Goyal / Alexis Beuchat0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Palmer / Danny van Fleet vs Preston Thomas / Rodrigo Lara2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 18 & Over Men Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
John Uselding
published
3.82
Andrew Elsdon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Robert Lough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Charley Whiteley
published 4
3.57
Gonzalo Quindos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Michael McGovern
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Kevin Grubb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Richard Emmendorfer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Creighton Vaught
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Danny van Fleet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Brian Boylston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Emmendorfer + Michael McGovern303 matchesnot enough data
Danny van Fleet + Creighton Vaught123 matchesnot enough data
John Uselding + Gonzalo Quindos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Uselding
10W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Andrew Elsdon
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Robert Lough
21W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Charley Whiteley
15W–13L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Gonzalo Quindos
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Michael McGovern
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kevin Grubb
33W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
Richard Emmendorfer
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Creighton Vaught
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Danny van Fleet
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Brian Boylston
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.