Teams

Penn Poachers

Mixed 40 & Over - Fall · 8.0 Mixed Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 3.92 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-07vs UMLY United 8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBen Hurtig / Sonya Lee vs Markus Edstrom / Helena Malarkey3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDietrich Chen / Elisabeth Blum vs Christopher Jones / Kathy Steinway6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesOliver Yu / Lynn Selhat vs Chris Powell / Min Lubiniecki5-7, 1-6
2021-10-09vs UMLY United 8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSonya Lee / Oliver Yu vs Min Lubiniecki / Andy Chung2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJill Cohen / John Schlesinger vs Quang Nguyen / Helena Malarkey0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Selhat / Damien Croft vs Annica Edstrom / Craig Miller1-6, 0-6
2021-09-26vs AceholesLost 12
W#1 DoublesDietrich Chen / Lynn Selhat vs Joseph Busby / Deborah Brown6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJill Cohen / Ben Hurtig vs Carlos Araujo / Hilary Noden3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesOliver Yu / Sonya Lee vs Ann Tracey / Jason Friel4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Penn Poachers03181699
2UMLY United 8.004120250

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Rosemary Kearney
published 4
3.75
Joe Picerno
published
3.73
Dietrich Chen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Ben Hurtig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Elisabeth Blum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Lynn Selhat
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Oliver Yu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Damien Croft
published 3.5
Jill Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sonya Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosemary Kearney + Ben Hurtig5157% games+9.6% vs expected
Dietrich Chen + Sonya Lee7062% gamesnot enough data
Ben Hurtig + Lynn Selhat4154% gamesnot enough data
Elisabeth Blum + Oliver Yu314 matchesnot enough data
Ben Hurtig + Sonya Lee134 matchesnot enough data
Oliver Yu + Sonya Lee033 matchesnot enough data
Oliver Yu + Lynn Selhat033 matchesnot enough data
Dietrich Chen + Lynn Selhat303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rosemary Kearney
106W–89L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Joe Picerno
42W–28L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
4
Dietrich Chen
27W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ben Hurtig
82W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Elisabeth Blum
54W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Lynn Selhat
67W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Oliver Yu
54W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Damien Croft
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jill Cohen
48W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sonya Lee
36W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.