Teams

CFrasier/RSchuler (Longview)

2024 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Women - Sat PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-17vs LPeterson (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCynthia Frasier / Pamela Beecher vs Virginia Jenkins / Amy Nielsen6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Schmit / Linda Beaton vs Leslie Peterson / Dale Hall2-6, 3-6
2024-05-11vs MNee (Sardis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Frasier / Susan Eastman Tilsch vs Debbie Miller / Nadine Neel3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesZuzana Bombardier / Jane Sickles vs Scott Bryan / Connell Pinckney6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRachael Schuler / Karen Rocchio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-21vs MNee (Sardis)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKelly John / Jane Sickles vs Brigid Downs / Julie Hollar3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesZuzana Bombardier / Karen Schmit vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-13vs LPeterson (OPRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTracey Vacca Atkinson / Karen Rocchio vs Jennifer Gardiner / Rhonda Coumas1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRuth Shaffner / Janet Szilagyi vs Leslie Peterson / Barbara Salvucci3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesZuzana Bombardier / Rachael Schuler vs Amy Adams / Lynn Davis2-6, 5-7
2024-03-30vs MNee (Sardis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Eastman Tilsch / Zuzana Bombardier vs Brigid Downs / Donna Mangum5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCynthia Frasier / Tracey Vacca Atkinson vs Dorothy Cato / Mary Peterson6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Rocchio / Janet Szilagyi vs Monica Nee / Nadine Neel6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-23vs MNee (Sardis)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Riggins / Karen Schmit vs Julie Hollar / Scott Bryan4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Russo / Jane Sickles vs Nadine Neel / Dorothy Cato3-6, 4-6
2024-03-23vs LPeterson (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesZuzana Bombardier / Kelly John vs Dale Hall / Sharon Gehrig3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Frasier / Rachael Schuler vs Amy Augustine / Susan Jaffe3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-02vs LPeterson (OPRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Russo / Jane Sickles vs Amy Augustine / Susan Love1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Frasier / Susan Eastman Tilsch vs Dale Hall / Sharon Gehrig3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesZuzana Bombardier / Lisa Riggins vs Janet Steyl / Amy Nielsen3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Cynthia Frasier
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.98
Karen Schmit
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Pamela Beecher
published
3.95
Zuzana Bombardier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.82
Janet Szilagyi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Linda Beaton
published
3.78
Lisa Riggins
published
3.77
Rachael Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.72
Jane Sickles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Tracey Vacca Atkinson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Kelly John
published
Ruth Shaffner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Schmit + Rachael Schuler314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cynthia Frasier
46W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Karen Schmit
82W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
Pamela Beecher
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
4.5
Zuzana Bombardier
14W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Linda Beaton
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Lisa Riggins
26W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Rachael Schuler
295W–156L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Jane Sickles
103W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Tracey Vacca Atkinson
95W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Kelly John
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ruth Shaffner
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.