Teams

KY/PAD/PAXTON/TURNER

2025 USTA COMBO DOUBLES 18 & OVER PADUCAH · 6.5 Adult Combo Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-25vs KY/PAD/KINEMANWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeigh Paxton / Katherine Withrow vs Donna Almand / Shawne Seibert6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeah Cunningham / Suzanne Farmer vs Angela DiCicco / Brandi Dowdy6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSara Falder / Ann Boyd vs Gaby Acree / Jaime Ealey6-4, 6-2
2025-08-28vs KY/PAD/KINEMANWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Halverson / Erin Herrmann vs Gaby Acree / Marta Elliott6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Turner / Abby Dority vs Corinne Rudd / Donna Almand7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLeigh Paxton / Mckenzie Woods vs Madelyn Chambers / Shawne Seibert6-0, 7-6
2025-08-11vs KY/PAD/KINEMANWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Herrmann / Katherine Withrow vs Madelyn Chambers / Gaby Acree6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLeigh Paxton / Mckenzie Woods vs Angela DiCicco / Jaime Ealey6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLeah Cunningham / Suzanne Farmer vs Karen Kineman / Denise Grissom6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Adult Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Holly Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Leigh Paxton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Kara Geiger
published
3.34
Mckenzie Woods
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Leah Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Erin Herrmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Katherine Withrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Abby Dority
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kelly Halverson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sara Falder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Farmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Cunningham + Holly Turner3454% games+8.5% vs expected
Leigh Paxton + Mckenzie Woods5070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Turner
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Leigh Paxton
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Kara Geiger
21W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.36
Mckenzie Woods
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Leah Cunningham
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Erin Herrmann
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Katherine Withrow
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Abby Dority
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kelly Halverson
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sara Falder
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Farmer
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.