Teams

BP RED

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

11 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-13vs BM BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeng Lian / Emese Nagy vs Andrew Jeffries / Susan Jeffries6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMatthew Ryan / Terming Chew vs Rob Payne / Carolyn Schilling6-4, 6-2
2023-08-06vs BP NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeng Lian / Emese Nagy vs Denise Belk / Travis Staebell6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-07-30vs BVP REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesMatthew Ryan / Yukiko Brooks vs Jarret Sutphin / Amanda Wootton6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeng Lian / Terming Chew vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-23vs BM BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Keefe / Emese Nagy vs Max Begoon / Aree Bly6-2, 7-6
2023-07-16vs BP NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Ryan / Terming Chew vs Paul Suyumov / Meg Staebell4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlbert Eng / Yukiko Brooks vs Matthew Hooper / Leslie Lane3-6, 6-7
2023-07-09vs BVP REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Ryan / Yukiko Brooks vs Megan Melucci / Jarret Sutphin6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Meng Lian
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Alexei Uecker
published 4.5
4.25
Charlotte Rhoad
published 4.5
4.21
Emese Nagy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.00
Albert Eng
published 4.5
3.94
Yukiko Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
John Keefe
published
3.88
Armando Escalante
published 4.5
3.84
Terming Chew
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Michael Gomez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meng Lian + Emese Nagy8165% games+5.7% vs expected
Yukiko Brooks + Michael Gomez3247% gamesnot enough data
Charlotte Rhoad + Michael Gomez044 matchesnot enough data
Emese Nagy + Albert Eng303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalia Isabel Camera Perez
34W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Meng Lian
94W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Alexei Uecker
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Charlotte Rhoad
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Emese Nagy
205W–39L career · 7 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Albert Eng
36W–12L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
John Keefe
2W–17L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.89
4.5
Armando Escalante
14W–54L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.88
4
Terming Chew
84W–76L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
Michael Gomez
19W–24L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.