Teams

EBlount.55.8.5C-HR

2026 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.05 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-09-01vs BBlackburn.55C-CHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesEddie Blount / William Calhoun vs Gabriel Dichter / Chris Combs6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErik J Erikson / Eric Lindblom vs Nathan Bearman / Alexis Maklakoff3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJon Koceja / Jon Post vs JOE BERTON / Jason Moon6-7, 2-6
2026-08-25vs BBlackburn.55C-CHTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJon Koceja / Hien Jimmy Nguyen vs Jason Moon / Bill Rader7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesWilliam Calhoun / Mark Stone vs Gabriel Dichter / Wendell Gilland2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesErik J Erikson / David Grose vs Boyd Blackburn / Nathan Bearman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
William Calhoun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Erik J Erikson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
David Slack
published 4.5
4.03
Eric Labow
published 4.5
4.02
Jon Koceja
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Hien Jimmy Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Eric Lindblom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Greg Matera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Jon Post
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Eddie Blount
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
David Grose
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.51
Chris Roessler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hien Jimmy Nguyen + Jon Koceja7554% games+0.6% vs expected
David Grose + Chris Roessler3450% games−1.8% vs expected
Eddie Blount + Eric Lindblom123 matchesnot enough data
Chris Roessler + Greg Matera303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Calhoun
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Erik J Erikson
32W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
David Slack
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.10
4.5
Eric Labow
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.03
Jon Koceja
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Hien Jimmy Nguyen
43W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Eric Lindblom
122W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Greg Matera
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Jon Post
67W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Eddie Blount
42W–45L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
David Grose
26W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Chris Roessler
41W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.