Teams

Racquet Club Rebels

2022 Pinellas NA Mixed Fall · 7.0 X Sunday

11 players · average NTRP 3.56 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlan Chin / Cathrine Chin vs Jeffrey Rogo / Arabela Stock6-2, 6-0
2022-11-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlan Chin / Cathrine Chin vs Allison Matheny / Jason Saposnik6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-11-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesCathrine Chin / Alan Chin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-06vs Treasure Bay XSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShelly Watkins / Scott Rogers vs Julia Pierce / Greg Barker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlan Chin / Cathrine Chin vs Jonathan Thompson / January Moennig6-4, 6-3
2022-10-30vs SPCC HagmanLost 01
L#3 DoublesShelly Watkins / Brian Mannari vs Lina Chaves / Brian Kaye0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-10-23vs SPTC Da Great 1sWon 10
W#1 DoublesShelly Watkins / Scott Rogers vs Kymberlee Olson / Tad Pequignot6-0, 6-1
2022-10-02vs Treasure Bay XWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoe Faraci / Shelly Watkins vs Michael Hancock / January Moennig6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlan Chin / Cathrine Chin vs Kristen Pierce / Henri Pichal7-5, 6-4
2022-09-25vs SPCC HagmanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShelly Watkins / Joe Faraci vs Jason Saposnik / Lina Chaves6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCathrine Chin / Alan Chin vs Allison Matheny / Scott Kovacic7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Cindy Hendriks
published 4
3.71
James Price
published 4
3.56
Kristin Blair
published
3.56
Joe Faraci
published
3.53
Alan Chin
published 3.5
3.50
Shelly Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Holly Dennis
published 3.5
3.33
Cathrine Chin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Jamie Dennis
published 3.5
3.12
Ken Degen
published
Brian Mannari
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Chin + Cathrine Chin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Hendriks
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
James Price
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Kristin Blair
5W–16L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Joe Faraci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Alan Chin
22W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Shelly Watkins
72W–53L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Holly Dennis
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Cathrine Chin
86W–124L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Jamie Dennis
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Ken Degen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Brian Mannari
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.